A Christian photographer recently scored a major religious freedom victory when the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky ruled that Louisville authorities violated his First Amendment rights.
Listen to the latest episode of “Quick Start” 👇
The photographer in question, Chelsea Nelson, challenged the law requiring a violation of conscience for traditional marriage. Although she faced no direct punishment or threats, she took preemptive action against the ordinance to prevent future problems.
“Attorneys from Alliance Defending Freedom, representing Chelsea Nelson and her photography studio, filed Chelsea Nelson Photography v. Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government in 2019 because Louisville law prohibited Nelson from expressing her views on marriage on the studio’s website and threatened to coerce her into creating photos and blogs celebrating messages about marriage that she did not believe in,” the press release explains.
Nelson told CBN News that even though she was a young mother trying to start a business and support her family, she felt compelled to speak out.
“I’m a Christian, so it affects every aspect of my life. Not just when I go to church on Sunday morning, but absolutely everything,” she said. “And I was well aware at the time that even people like Jack Phillips, who were in the news, were getting criticized just for quietly trying to run their business in a way that was consistent with their Christian beliefs.”
Nelson said she wants to run her business in alignment with the Lord while growing in a way that aligns with rules and regulations.
“When I learned about this ordinance in Louisville, I was really worried that I could be reported and fined $10,000 at any moment for simply being open about the message I celebrate… Marriage between a man and a woman is for life and nothing else,” she said.
Brian Neihart, senior counsel at conservative law firm Alliance Defending Freedom, spoke about Nelson’s six-year legal journey and expressed regret over the controversial ordinance.
“The basic premise of the Chelsea case is that the government cannot force the American people to say something they don’t believe,” he told CBN News. “And the city of Louisville passed a law that they interpreted to require Chelsea to create photos and blogs celebrating views of marriage that were contrary to her faith.”
“And this law had two different features. One, it forced her to create speech that was contrary to her beliefs. … It even prohibited her from posting on her website, ‘This is my Christian belief, this is what I believe about marriage, and I will only create photos and blogs that are consistent with that belief.'”
The attorney said Nelson’s case is similar to the Supreme Court’s 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis case, which concluded in 2023. Laurie Smith, a graphic and web designer who runs 303 Creative, argued in a 6-3 ruling that Colorado censors Christian beliefs.
Despite this victory, similar laws continue to exist across the United States.
“There are laws across the country, like the city of Louisville, that force artists to create work that violates their religious beliefs,” Neihart said. “And in 2023, the Supreme Court said these laws violate the First Amendment when applied to speech.”
Nelson encountered courts that followed the same blueprint in this case. Despite the victory, she said the fight was not easy.
“To be honest, it was really difficult at first,” she said. “People I thought were friends, people I thought were fellow believers, in trying to clarify this point, essentially disowned me for standing up for what I believe the Bible says very loudly and clearly, not what it says quietly. So that part was difficult.”
Nelson wasn’t surprised by the negative reaction from non-Christians because they have a different belief system and worldview. Still, she hopes they will look at the issue differently.
“I want more people to understand that I’m actually fighting for their right to create something that aligns with their beliefs, even if it’s a different worldview or belief system than mine,” she said. “But in the end, the Lord helped me grow a very thick skin, and He really used my children as motivation.”
Nelson said her “testimony” to her children is important, and she knows that one day they will grow up and look back on how their mother feared God more than men and feared her boldly.
“That was an incredible inspiration to me,” she said. “I hope one day they actually know that their mother was faithful, even though they don’t know anything about what’s been going on for the past six years right now, and hopefully they’ll be grateful.”
Neihart said the decision in Nelson’s favor is “important for several reasons.”
“The district court here in Kentucky has done an excellent job of explaining why the photo shoot is speech,” he said, noting that his client is entitled to nominal damages because of the fact that Nelson’s speech was “callous.”
“Nominal damages are a way to hold the government accountable when it violates constitutional rights,” Neihart said. “And lastly, the district court will permanently enjoin, permanently prevent, the City of Louisville from enforcing any law that would force Chelsea to create messages contrary to her beliefs.”
As the number of voices facing censorship from big tech companies continues to grow, sign up for FaithWire’s daily newsletter and download the CBN News app developed by our parent company to get the latest news from a distinctly Christian perspective.
